Film critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Film critique - Essay Example It also highlights the decisions and activities that characterized the Bush administration after the September 11 incident. According to Michael Moore, the Bush administration used the tragic September 11 incident as an excuse to engage in unjust wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (Moore, 2004). The plot of the documentary revolves around the September 11 incident. This is a critical account in the history of the United States. Michael Moore pursues a very critical topic and issue in this film, expressing social, economic and political concerns that surrounded United States after the terrorist attack. This means that Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) is centrally located in the heart of American people, thereby being likely to capture massive audience. Michael Moore successfully establishes a strong audience base by pursuing an issue that many just took as terrorist attack. To Moore, the aftermath of the attack took a new perspective that laid ground for unjust practices by Bush and his administratio n. Michael Moore’s analysis of what happened after the September 11 incident leaves so much to be desired. For this reason, the setting of the film is critically positioned. The film was produced three years after the attacks, a time when wounds were still fresh in the minds of many and the political debate of the incident was still exacerbating. This timing on this film is perfect, given that all aspects of the American life had been affected by the incident. The highlighted interviews, and the collected views and opinions of the American people show that different people had different understanding of the events that followed the attacks. In this regard, Michael Moore gets those who argue alongside his claims, as well those who dispute the claims outlined in the film. This film is, therefore, two-sided, meaning that it encompasses both propositions and oppositions to the issues raised. In other words, the tragic events that befell United States in September 11 are clearly o utlined before Moore expresses his view on the matter. After these events are highlighted, a critical evaluation of the matter is done. In so doing, the American society has wholly associated itself with part of the film in one way or another, whether they agree or disagree with Moore’s views. While Moore has successfully tried to account for what happened after the September 11 terrorist attacks, some of his views are exaggerated. While his allegations against the Bush administration are true, some of them are way too much personal. The fact that United States is the world’s superpower gives it a significant reason to engage in war at it deems necessary. Moore disputes the Bush administration’s reason to engage Afghanistan and Iraq in war, terming the action unjust (Moore, 2004). However, Osama and his terrorist group Al Qaeda admitted to carrying out the attacks. This was not the first time that Osama and his team had engaged in terrorism. Other states around the world had also experienced terrorist attacks before United States did. Even if United States could not have engaged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq on her behalf, it was right to do so, on behalf of the weaker world communities that had previously been targeted by terrorist groups. Michael Moore wrote the script to the film, and subsequently directed it. He, therefore, delivers a quality film in